Verifex vs sanctions.io
Compare two screening APIs by evidence, coverage, integration model, and current commercial fit.
Choose from operating model, evidence requirements, and ownership cost. Vendor features and commercial terms change; confirm them directly before procurement.
- Coverage
- Source scope and update expectations
- Evidence
- What a reviewer can reconstruct
- Operations
- Implementation and commercial fit
Third-party details reviewed 13 August 2026. sanctions.io pricing and product options (opens in a new tab)
Start with what your team wants to own.
sanctions.io offers screening, monitoring, a user portal, and CRM integrations. Its current site includes a pricing calculator and custom-proposal flow based on annual screening volume, monitored entities, selected watchlists, integrations, and contract terms.
Verifex takes a different approach: transparent pricing from €49/month after a 5-screen free trial, a published benchmark with disclosed methodology, confidence intervals and limitations, and self-serve signup with no sales call required.
Read the evaluation criteria
Both products support API-led screening. The useful comparison is whether you need sanctions.io's configurable commercial package and integrations, or Verifex's self-serve plans, disclosed production-engine benchmark, explicit coverage semantics, and evidence record. Confirm current certifications and source coverage directly during procurement.
For implementation detail, review the Verifex screening workflow, including coverage semantics, evidence, and integration boundaries.
Compare the operating model.
This table is a directional evaluation aid, not a substitute for current vendor documentation, a security review, or legal and procurement diligence.
| Decision point | Verifex | sanctions.io |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Free trial + published plans | Calculator + custom proposal |
| Evaluation access | 5 trial screens, no card | Sandbox available; confirm terms |
| Source coverage | Configured by plan and operational state | Configurable watchlist package |
| PEP screening | Yes | Yes |
| Developer integration | OpenAPI + official SDKs | REST API |
| Published production-engine benchmark | Yes | Verify with vendor |
| Commercial onboarding | Self-serve | Proposal-based |
| Confidence scores | Yes | Yes |
| Batch API | Yes | Yes |
| Current certifications | Published security controls; no SOC 2 claim | Verify current report with vendor |
Choose Verifex when
You want the operation managed and the decision exposed.
- Transparent pricing from €49/month with a 5-screen free trial
- Published benchmark methodology, with limitations and confidence intervals stated
- Self-serve signup, no sales call needed
- Results returned in the same API request
- REST API with OpenAPI spec; official SDKs for Python, Node.js, Go & Rust
Choose sanctions.io when
Its model aligns more closely with what you need to control.
- Screening and continuous-monitoring packages
- Configurable watchlist and adverse-media options
- User portal plus Salesforce and HubSpot integrations
- Volume-based proposal model
The first useful proof is a real response.
curl -X POST https://api.verifex.tech/v1/screen \
-H "Authorization: Bearer vfx_your_api_key" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"name": "Rosneft", "type": "entity"}'Make the tradeoffs explicit.
How does Verifex pricing compare to sanctions.io?
Verifex publishes self-serve plan prices and included volume. sanctions.io now publishes a pricing calculator that produces a custom proposal from volume, monitoring, source, integration, and contract choices. Compare the resulting annual commitment and included workflow, not an old credit-price assumption.
Which API has better sanctions list coverage?
The relevant answer depends on the specific lists required by your jurisdictions and risk assessment. Verifex exposes configured coverage and operational state; sanctions.io lets buyers select watchlist packages. Ask both providers to map your required sources and show how unavailable or stale coverage appears in results.
Which is better for startups and early-stage fintechs?
Verifex offers self-serve signup, a free trial, published plan pricing, and internal benchmark data. sanctions.io uses a proposal workflow shaped by volume and selected products. The better fit depends on procurement, required integrations, evidence, and total cost.
Can I migrate from sanctions.io to Verifex?
Both products expose REST APIs, but migration time depends on field mapping, thresholds, source semantics, monitoring, webhooks, retention, and historical evidence. Run a parallel validation before changing decision authority.
Related comparisons and guides